Why teams pick AccessMap
Access review is a compliance requirement that most organisations treat as a twice-yearly fire drill. A spreadsheet is exported from each system, circulated to managers via email, filled in over two weeks of chasing, and filed. The process is manual, incomplete, and produces evidence that an experienced auditor will probe for gaps.
AccessMap automates the parts that should never have been manual. The inventory is pulled from connected systems in real time — not exported to a spreadsheet that is stale by the time reviewers see it. Campaign reminders are automated — the system escalates to a manager's manager if a review is not completed by the deadline. Deprovisioning on rejection is automatic — a reviewer clicking "revoke" triggers a SCIM call that removes the access, not an email to an operations team.
The separation of duties detection is the capability that catches the access combinations that quarterly reviews miss. A user who has both payment approval and payment creation access is a segregation of duties violation regardless of whether either access was intentionally granted. AccessMap flags these combinations continuously, not only during review cycles.
Who it is for
AccessMap is used by security teams managing SOC 2, ISO 27001, or HIPAA compliance programmes, IT teams drowning in quarterly access review spreadsheets, and regulated organisations that need continuous entitlement monitoring rather than periodic snapshots.